Episode 9 - Teleclinics in secondary care: How do we supervise trainees? PSU Pandemic Podcasts Episode 9 - Teleclinics in secondary care: How do we supervise trainees? Email Subscription Subscribe here to be notified when new podcasts are released. To unsubscribe please email psu.lase@hee.nhs.uk. Released On: 3 September 2020 Planning & Production Credits: Victoria Twigg (Lead), Sarah Siddiqui, Jane Gardner-Florence Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the NHS embrace the use of tele-medicine as a way to continue to provide high-quality patient care whilst maintaining social distancing. As we enter the recovery phase it is likely to continue to be used as the key modality for conducting outpatient work. In addition to the benefits of infection prevention, telemedicine has a host of other advantages for patients and the health service but does bring challenges to the clinician and, in particular, to supervision and the trainee-trainer relationship. In this Pandemic Podcast, we are in conversation with clinicians and trainers Jo Szram and Indranil Chakravorty discussing the key issues and trainee Vicky Twigg, reflecting on the benefits of telemedicine, how to conduct teleclinics and common pitfalls and best practice in using teleclinics as a training modality. Biographies: Oluseyi Adesalu is a differential attainment fellow in the London & KSS Professional Support Unit. Having completed the academic foundation programme, she will be commencing specialty training in clinical radiology in September. Victoria Twigg is a higher surgical trainee in ENT in North London undertaking a fellowship at HEE looking at early-years surgical education across the region. She has an interest in leadership and management across the healthcare sector, with a focus on workforce policy. Jo Szram is a consultant respiratory physician at the Royal Brompton Hospital, a deputy postgraduate dean in London, chair of NACT UK and sits on the Councils of the Royal College of Physicians and the RSM Patient Safety Section Council. Indranil Chakravorty is director of medical education and a consultant acute physician at St George's Hospital in South London. He has run projects in South London on telehealth monitoring of patients with chronic disease. He is an ex-deputy dean for Health Education England and has a passion for technology enhanced learning. Andrew Viggars is an ST4 specialty registrar in clinical oncology working in the Yorkshire and Humber deanery. He has recently taken up post as a clinical leadership fellow in acute oncology. Nadeev Wijesuriya is a cardiology trainee working in the North West London deanery, sub-specialising in electrophysiology and devices. His academic interests are in the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation. Thank you for listening to this Podcast. We would like to hear your thoughts and feedback, so we can continue to improve and bring you material relevant to your needs. Please complete the questionnaire below. Profession * - Select -DoctorDentistDieticianNurseMidwifePharmacistHealthcare ScientistPhysiotherapistRadiographerParamedicOther Job title * - Select -TraineeQualified Healthcare ProfessionalSupervisorNone of the above To what extent do you agree with the following statements? * Strongly agreeAgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree This podcast was relevant to my needs * This podcast was relevant to my needs - Strongly agree This podcast was relevant to my needs - Agree This podcast was relevant to my needs - Neither Agree nor Disagree This podcast was relevant to my needs - Disagree This podcast was relevant to my needs - Strongly Disagree The format allowed the topic to be presented clearly * The format allowed the topic to be presented clearly - Strongly agree The format allowed the topic to be presented clearly - Agree The format allowed the topic to be presented clearly - Neither Agree nor Disagree The format allowed the topic to be presented clearly - Disagree The format allowed the topic to be presented clearly - Strongly Disagree The content was informative and interesting to listen to * The content was informative and interesting to listen to - Strongly agree The content was informative and interesting to listen to - Agree The content was informative and interesting to listen to - Neither Agree nor Disagree The content was informative and interesting to listen to - Disagree The content was informative and interesting to listen to - Strongly Disagree I learnt something that I can use in my life/work from this * I learnt something that I can use in my life/work from this - Strongly agree I learnt something that I can use in my life/work from this - Agree I learnt something that I can use in my life/work from this - Neither Agree nor Disagree I learnt something that I can use in my life/work from this - Disagree I learnt something that I can use in my life/work from this - Strongly Disagree I would recommend this podcast to others * I would recommend this podcast to others - Strongly agree I would recommend this podcast to others - Agree I would recommend this podcast to others - Neither Agree nor Disagree I would recommend this podcast to others - Disagree I would recommend this podcast to others - Strongly Disagree Do you have any other thoughts about the content or format of this podcast? (e.g. most valuable elements or improvements needed) Are there any topics you would find helpful or interesting for future Podcast episodes? CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. What code is in the image? * Submit